Nigerian Journal of Clinical Practice

ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year
: 2022  |  Volume : 25  |  Issue : 11  |  Page : 1875--1882

Evaluation of postprandial symptoms in two different laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy techniques using gastric emptying scintigraphy


F Yilmaz1, G Kara Gedik1, H Yilmaz2 
1 Department of Nuclear Medicine, Selcuk University Medical Faculty, Konya, Turkey
2 Department of General Surgery, Selcuk University Medical Faculty, Konya, Turkey

Correspondence Address:
Dr. F Yilmaz
Associate Professor of Nuclear Medicine, Selcuk University Medical Faculty, Konya
Turkey

Background: Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is a frequently used procedure in the surgical treatment of obesity in recent years. However, surgeons have different opinions regarding the distance from the antrum to the pylorus. In addition, postprandial symptoms significantly affect the overall quality of life. Aim: Therefore, this study aimed to understand the relationship between postprandial symptoms with gastric emptying time and surgical procedures. Patients and Methods: Sixty patients who underwent LSG surgery were analyzed retrospectively and divided into two groups: antrum preserved (AP) and antrum resected (AR). The antral resection margin was 2 cm from the pylorus in 35 patients (AR group) and 6 cm in 25 patients (AP group). Semisolid gastric emptying scintigraphy (GES) was performed prospectively in both groups. Postprandial symptoms were standardized with a questionnaire. The relationship of symptoms with a half time of gastric emptying (GE T½), retention percentage at 30 and 60 minutes, lag phase, body mass index (BMI), and a decline in excess weight (% EWL), and antrum resection were investigated. The obtained results were compared between the two groups and with the control group. Results: The study group comprised 60 patients (49 F/11 M, mean age: 40.3 ± 20.1 years, BMI 31.6 ± 8.1 kg/m2). The half-time of gastric emptying in the AR and AP groups (28.00 min ± 9.58, 28.24 min ± 11.90, respectively), percentage gastric retention at 30 and 60 minutes in the AR and AP groups (30 minutes: %44.37 ± 17.88, %40.52 ± 14.56 and 60 minutes: 17 ± 8.9, 19 ± 3.1) was significantly different compared with the control group, but no significant difference was observed between the study groups. In addition, there was no statistically significant difference between the AR and AP groups in postprandial symptom scores >9 (68.6%, 60%, P = 0.681), GER (77.1%, 64%, P = 0.253), and postoperative BMI (p = .397), % EWL (p = .975), and T lag phase (p = .332). Conclusions: In our study, the postprandial symptoms were not affected between two different surgical procedures in LSG.


How to cite this article:
Yilmaz F, Gedik G K, Yilmaz H. Evaluation of postprandial symptoms in two different laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy techniques using gastric emptying scintigraphy.Niger J Clin Pract 2022;25:1875-1882


How to cite this URL:
Yilmaz F, Gedik G K, Yilmaz H. Evaluation of postprandial symptoms in two different laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy techniques using gastric emptying scintigraphy. Niger J Clin Pract [serial online] 2022 [cited 2023 Feb 2 ];25:1875-1882
Available from: https://www.njcponline.com/article.asp?issn=1119-3077;year=2022;volume=25;issue=11;spage=1875;epage=1882;aulast=Yilmaz;type=0