Medical and Dental Consultantsí Association of Nigeria
Home - About us - Editorial board - Search - Ahead of print - Current issue - Archives - Submit article - Instructions - Subscribe - Advertise - Contacts - Login 
  Users Online: 3399   Home Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size
 
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2022  |  Volume : 25  |  Issue : 9  |  Page : 1535-1541

The efficacy of bismuth quadruple therapy, sequential therapy, and hybrid therapy as a first-line regimen for Helicobacter pylori infection compared with standard triple therapy


1 Department of Gastroenterology, Fatih Sultan Mehmet Research and Education Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
2 Department of Gastroenterology, Giresun University, Giresun, Turkey
3 Department of Internal Medicine, Yeditepe University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey

Correspondence Address:
Dr. M A Ozturk
Department of Internal Medicine, Yeditepe University Hospital, Istanbul
Turkey
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/njcp.njcp_89_22

Rights and Permissions

Background and Aim: To compare the effectiveness of first-line Helicobacter pylori eradication treatments as standard triple therapy (sTT), bismuth-containing quadruple therapy (BQT), sequential therapy (ST), and hybrid therapy (HT). Patients and Methods: 303 patients treated between July 2018 and June 2021 were studied. In this study, 76 patients in the sTT group, 78 patients in the BQT group, 75 patients in the ST group, and 74 patients in the HT group were randomly allocated. The diagnosis of H. pylori was made endoscopically. H. pylori stool antigen test was performed 4 weeks after finishing the treatment. Results: The mean age was 48.53 (13.48) in sTT, 49.04 (13.02) in BQT, 48.47 (14.54) in ST, and 47.45 (13.4) in HT. There was no significant age difference among the groups (P = 0.909). H. pylori eradication rate in intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis was 68.4% in sTT, 79.5% in BQT, 78.7% in ST, and 83.8% in HT. There was no significant difference between sTT, BQT, and ST regarding of eradication rate. The difference between HT and sTT was significant (P = 0.028). In the per-protocol (PP) analysis, the eradication rate was 74.3% in sTT, 88.6% in BQT, 86.8% in ST, and 92.5% in HT. There was a significant difference between sTT and BQT (P = 0.030) and sTT and HT (P = 0.004), whereas there was borderline significant difference between sTT and ST (P = 0.065). Conclusion: In terms of eradication, HT had the best rate, whereas the lowest rate was in the sTT treatment group. This study does not recommend using sTT because of the low eradication rates. This study recommends HT for overcoming antibiotic resistance and better results.


[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed186    
    Printed4    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded35    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal