Medical and Dental Consultantsí Association of Nigeria
Home - About us - Editorial board - Search - Ahead of print - Current issue - Archives - Submit article - Instructions - Subscribe - Advertise - Contacts - Login 
  Users Online: 1951   Home Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size
 

  Table of Contents 
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2022  |  Volume : 25  |  Issue : 12  |  Page : 1973-1977

An effective artificial testing model to reliability experiments for electronic apex locator devices used in endodontic practice


Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Karabük University, Karabük, Turkey

Date of Submission12-Jan-2022
Date of Acceptance10-Nov-2022
Date of Web Publication19-Dec-2022

Correspondence Address:
Dr. O Ozdemir
Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Karabük University, Karabük - 78050
Turkey
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/njcp.njcp_27_22

Rights and Permissions
   Abstract 


Background and Aim: This experimental study aimed to investigate the reliability of using electronic apex locator devices to determine the working length of artificial root canals. Materials and Methods: The experiments were performed using resin endoblocks and mandibular canine teeth (n = 20/group). After the same working length of root canal samples was provided, the teeth and artificial root canals were embedded in an alginate mold. The measurements with Root ZX® and Propex Pixi® apex locators were performed and recorded. The data were analyzed using SPSS software (SPSS V23; IBM Corp., Armonk, New York, USA) and the variance was set at P < 0.05. Results: There was no significant difference between the groups; mean distance from the actual working length using different apex locators (P = 0.633, P = 0.474), and endpoint positioning distributions (P = 0.591). Conclusion: The results indicate that the artificial model could be a laboratory method of determining the accuracy of apex locators and efficient calibration of devices before their clinical use.

Keywords: Artificial test method, artificial tooth, electronic apex locator, working length determination


How to cite this article:
Ozdemir O. An effective artificial testing model to reliability experiments for electronic apex locator devices used in endodontic practice. Niger J Clin Pract 2022;25:1973-7

How to cite this URL:
Ozdemir O. An effective artificial testing model to reliability experiments for electronic apex locator devices used in endodontic practice. Niger J Clin Pract [serial online] 2022 [cited 2023 Feb 3];25:1973-7. Available from: https://www.njcponline.com/text.asp?2022/25/12/1973/364191




   Introduction Top


Successful prognosis of root canal treatment depends on various steps. These stages include: shaping, disinfection, and three-dimensional obturation of the correct working length of the root canal space.[1],[2] The root canal treatment working length (WL) of a root canal has been described as the distance from the coronal reference point to the apical constriction of the root canal.[2],[3] The minor anatomical diameter of the apical foramen, defined as apical constriction (AC) or cementum–dentine junction, is the narrowest part of the root canal with the smallest diameter of blood supply. This feature confines it to the smallest wound area, and thus provides the best healing condition.[2],[3] Therefore, AC, the minor transition point from the root canal to the periodontal tissues, should be the endpoint of the WL.[2],[4] Several techniques have been used to determine the WL; however, electronic location of the root canal endpoint is the most accepted and reliable technique considering the disadvantages of radiographic determination.[5],[6]

With the technological developments, the manufacturers have put many electronic apex locator devices (EALs) on the market; however, Root ZX® (J. Morita, Tokyo, Japan) and Root ZX® Mini apex locators with the same working principle are considered the gold standard devices. Their reliabilities have been proven in many studies.[6],[7],[8],[9] Furthermore, Propex Pixi® (Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland) is also a reliable device with similar success rates to Root ZX.[6],[10]

The EALs can determine the zero point of the apex, which corresponds to the major transition to the periapical tissues; however, this level does not indicate the AC. Establishing the exact location of the AC is a clinical challenge.[9] It was reported that the position is usually 0.5–1.0 mm short of the zero point determined by EALs; however, the actual distance between the AC and the major apical foramen varied from 0.3 to 3.80 mm.[11],[12],[13] Studies have shown differences in the accuracy of EALs because of the variation of complex apical anatomy of the tooth; besides, the clinical and ex vivo studies have limitations to standardization.[9],[10],[13],[14],[15] Therefore, there is a need for suitable and effective calibration techniques for these tools.

The resin endoblocks, which correspond to the simulation of the root canal, have the unique characteristics to standardize the research method and exclude parameters that could influence the anatomical and clinical variations by providing similar root canal length, shape, and diameter.[16],[17] Previous reports of endodontic researches presented that artificial root canals could be used in different endodontic approaches for a standardized test model.[16],[17],[18],[19],[20] However, to the best of our knowledge, no study has been evaluated or compared the artificial canals for reliability experiments for electronically locating the root canal endpoint. In this context, this study aimed to investigate the usability of simulated artificial root canals as an effective technique in a comparative manner for the reliability of the EALs experiments before clinical use.


   Materıals and Methods Top


The evaluation was accomplished in full accordance with ethical principles, according to the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki and standing orders of the ethics committee (Non-interventional Clinical Studies Protocol Number: 2021/11-09.06.2021). The methodology was conducted similar to preceding EALs reliability studies.[5],[9],[10],[21] All the measurements were performed by a single experienced operator previously trained in the use of selected EALs. To set a standardized experimental model and exclude variations in comparison, two different reliability-tested apex locators were used on the same samples of which actual lengths were set and determined.

Sample Selection and Actual Working Length Determination

Twenty fabricated standard resin endoblocks (1 × 1 × 3 cm; taper 0.02; canal length 16 mm, Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland) were selected. The blocks were sequentially numbered from 1 to 20 and controlled for apical patency with a #10 K-file (Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland). The #10 K-file was inserted into the artificial canal until it reached the apex under ×3.5 magnification. The rubber stopper of the file was fixed, and the length was measured using 0.01-mm precision digital calipers. Each sample was determined and recorded at 16 mm. Measured artificial canals with different values were excluded from the study.

Twenty mandibular canines which had completely formed apices with similar shapes and lengths were selected. The tissue remnants and calculus were removed mechanically. Teeth with complicated root canal anatomy, immature root formation, internal or external root resorption, and previous root canal treatment were excluded. The presence of a single apical foramen for each canal was determined under a dental operational microscope (Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany). Radicular access and pulp tissue removal were accomplished in a standard manner. The teeth samples were sequentially numbered from 1 to 20, and controlled for apical patency with a #10 K file (Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland). The WL of each canal was determined as the file was seen from the apex under × 3.5 magnification. After sectioning the crowns with a diamond disk to achieve 16-mm canal length using 0.01-mm precision digital calipers, the standard root canal samples of the same length were provided.

Experimental Setup and Electronic Working Length Determination

The experimental model is presented in [Figure 1]. The teeth and resin artificial blocks were embedded in an alginate mold that was kept moist with a saline solution, and the measurements of root canal length with selected EALs (Root ZX®, J. Morita, Tokyo, Japan; Propex Pixi®, Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland) using #15 K file (Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland) were performed to determine the zero point of the apex which is the major transition to the simulated periapical tissues. For a stable measurement, the rubber stopper was fixed when the electronic bar of the EALs steadily progressed to the zero point sign for at least five seconds. For unstable measurements, the file was removed, and the approach was repeated as mentioned above. The determined length was measured using 0.01-mm precision digital calipers and recorded for both artificial and natural teeth.
Figure 1: Representative experimental model

Click here to view


Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS software (SPSS V23; IBM Corp., Armonk, New York, USA). The data were subjected to the Shapiro–Wilk normality test for determination of distribution. Generalized linear models were used to examine the main effects of the tooth groups and EALs. The Chi-square test was used to compare the distribution of the determined distance from the actual WL of EALs according to groups. The data were statistically analyzed at a variance of P < 0.05.


   Results Top


[Table 1] and [Table 2] present the comprehensive comparison of EALs measurements using different tooth structures. No significant difference was found for the WL measurement among the groups, devices, and group–device interactions on the determination (P = 0.591, P = 0.995, P = 0.633). There was no statistically significant mean distance from the actual working length of the groups, devices, and group–device interactions (P = 0.591, P = 0.491, P = 0.474). Also, no statistically significant differences were found between the WL endpoint positioning distributions according to the groups in Root ZX Mini, Propex Pixi EALs (P = 1.000, P = 0.574), and regardless of the device (P = 0.591) [Figure 2]. In the Root ZX Mini group, 50% of the artificial teeth were longer than the actual WL with the mean of 0.054 ± 0.279; 50% of the natural teeth were determined longer with the mean of −0.065 ± 0.361. In the Propex Pixi group, 50% of the artificial teeth were longer than the actual WL with the mean of −0.007 ± 0.218; 50% of the natural teeth were longer; and 40% were shorter with the mean of 0.010 ± 0.381. Regardless of the device, 50% of the artificial group were longer than the actual WL with a total mean of 0.024 ± 0.245; 50% of the natural group were determined longer with a total mean of −0.028 ± 0.363.
Table 1: Descriptive statistics of the WL determination and mean distance from the actual working length by group and device (P<0.05)

Click here to view
Table 2: Comparison to the distribution of the endpoint positioning from the actual WL of EALs according to groups

Click here to view
Figure 2: Mean distance to actual WL among the groups and devices with standard deviations

Click here to view



   Discussion Top


Due to limitations in the standardization of extracted teeth in the preclinical EALs experiments, artificial root canals were evaluated in this study for various reasons, such as manufactured with standardized lengths, with known positions, and apical diameter parameters that may well affect the outcome of the measurement and reliability. Furthermore, evidence suggests that artificial canals are a valid substitute for the tooth in previous researches.[16],[17],[18],[19],[20]

The in vitro test model for EALs was first proposed by Czerw et al.[21] The comparative evaluation of in vitro and in vivo models concluded no statistically significant differences between the in vivo and the in vitro groups.[5] Accurate mimicry of periodontal tissues may explain the consistency of in vitro and in vivo study results. For clinical simulation of accuracy experiments, the alginate and sponge models have been used to mimic the periodontal tissues.[22],[23] Natural and artificial teeth were placed into alginate mold to mimic periapical soft tissues as a conducting ambient for the electrical circuit between the clip attached file inside the root canal. The lip clip mounted to the alginate was considered the ideal medium for laboratory evaluation of EALs.[23],[24],[25] The working principle of the EALs is based on closed-circuit electrical conductivity. In the absence of an insulator such as dentin, the electrical circuit is closed, and a “ZERO” reading is obtained.[22] The artificial resin canals also have an insulator structure like dentin.

The EALs have been reported to be reliable for determining WL by locating the major foramen.[5],[6],[7],[8],[9],[10],[14],[15],[26] However, it was suggested that the precise location of the minor foramen or AC cannot be determined, and it has been presented that the constriction might not always exist.[27] Therefore, even though the blocks have limited AC, because of being insulators, this study focused on the hypothesis that artificial resin canals might also be used for the accuracy of experiments or calibration of EALs.

Wrbas et al.[28] recommended that the same sample be measured to precisely compare the accuracy and variations in determining the WL among the types of EALs. Therefore, this study was conducted in the same samples in groups (artificial, natural) for measurements of actual WL and electronically locating the WL with different devices.

Various authors suggested that the WL could be calculated to be 0.5–1 mm shorter than the determined length by EALs.[2],[3],[4] However, the methodology of this study was arranged regardless of AC location calculation because of the reason mentioned above. The major apical foramen determination was the indicator for the comparison.

The previous EALs accuracy experiments were performed using a tolerance of ±0.5–1 mm that was assumed to be a reliable measurement range.[6],[22],[25] Since the present experimental model was an applicability evaluation, the accepted ±0.5–1-mm error tolerance for the EALs was not applied, and directly obtained data were compared. Nevertheless, in all groups, the measurements were in the acceptable range. In addition, the absolute mean of the determined distance from the actual WL values of the groups was numerically similar; however, the standard deviation of the artificial tooth was less than the natural group values. Thus, the results indicated that the artificial tooth presented more consistent determination in an acceptable range.

Root ZX® mini accurately determines the actual WL of 83.33–100% tolerance with ±0.5–1 mm, respectively.[6] The percentage of accurate measurements by Propex Pixi was reported to be 83.33–89.99% of the tolerance.[6] Root ZX® Mini and Propex Pixi® were used in this study, as studies reported were with similar accuracy.[6],[9],[10] This study presented consistent results with no statistical differences in selected EALs measurements in both groups.

Huang conducted an extensive study to understand better the working principles of EALs in vitro, as well as using an artificial apparatus.[29] The apparatus used to mimic the natural tooth was a glass tubule, and the saline solution mimicked the periodontium. Although the study results differed according to the change in tube diameter, some data obtained were in agreement with this study in terms of idea and results. For an inexpensive endodontic teaching model about WL determination using radiography and electronic apex locator, Tchorz et al.[30] first proposed for an artificial tooth model using fabricated resin (VDW, Munich, Germany) with multiple roots and colored root canals. However, the pilot observational study was focused on evaluating the students' preclinical training. Besides, Bernardo et al.[31] used only artificial teeth for the EALs experiment. However, the validity of using artificial teeth for the EALs experiment was unknown up to the present. As a result, the null hypothesis was accepted that artificial models could be used in reliability experiments.

Laboratory studies introduced the preliminary results to improve the clinical situations. However, all evaluation methods have limitations compared to each other. Therefore, it is crucial to calibrate laboratory studies to the clinical conditions and present standardized test models to evaluate the accuracy of EALs as regards endodontic treatment outcomes. Further studies are required to understand better the proposed test model and the clinical impact of the results.

In conclusion, the results in this study give a complete agreement between natural and artificial teeth to determine the apical transition to the simulated periodontal tissues from the major foramen. The results indicated that the artificial model could be a handy laboratory method for assessing the accuracy of electronic apex locator devices. It is considered that the artificial EALs test model proposed in this study could be helpful for the efficient calibration of devices before their clinical use.

Declaration of patient consent

The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form the patient(s) has/have given his/her/their consent for his/her/their images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patients understand that their names and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.

Artificial Method for Reliability of Apex Locator Devices.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
   References Top

1.
Sjögren U, Figdor D, Persson S, Sundqvist G. Influence of infection at the time of root filling on the outcome of endodontic treatment of teeth with apical periodontitis. Int Endod J 1997;30:297–306.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Ricucci D, Langeland K. Apical limit of root canal instrumentation and obturation, part 2. A histological study. Int Endod J 1998;1:394–409.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Sharma MC, Arora V. Determination of working length of root canal. Med J Armed Forces India 2010;66:231–4.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Estrela C, Holland R, Estrela CR, Alencar AH, Sousa-Neto MD, Pécora JD. Characterization of successful root canal treatment. Braz Dent J 2014;25:3–11.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Duran-Sindreu F, Stöber E, Mercadé M, Vera J, Garcia M, Bueno R, et al. Comparison of in vivo and in vitro readings when testing the accuracy of the root ZX apex locator. J Endod 2012;38:236–9.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Serna-Peña G, Gomes-Azevedo S, Flores-Treviño J, Madla-Cruz E, Rodríguez-Delgado I, Martínez-González G. In vivo evaluation of 3 electronic apex locators: Root ZX Mini, Apex ID, and propex pixi. J Endod 2020;46:158–61.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Carvalho AL, Moura-Netto C, Moura AA, Marques MM, Davidowicz H. Accuracy of three electronic apex locators in the presence of different irrigating solutions. Braz Oral Res 2010;24:394–8.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Aguiar BA, Reinaldo RS, Frota LM, do Vale MS, de Vasconcelos BC. Root ZX electronic foramen locator: An ex vivo study of its three models' precision and reproducibility. Int J Dent 2017;2017:5893790.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Kang JA, Kim SK. Accuracies of seven different apex locators under various conditions. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2008;106:57–62.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Oliveira TN, Vivacqua-Gomes N, Bernardes RA, Vivan RR, Duarte MAH, Vasconcelos BC. Determination of the accuracy of 5 electronic apex locators in the function of different employment protocols. J Endod 2017;43:1663–7.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Kuttler Y. Microscopic investigation of root apices. J Am Dent Assoc 1955;50:544–52.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Mizutani T, Ohno N, Nakamura H. Anatomical study of the root apex in the maxillary anterior teeth. J Endod 1992;18:344–7.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Gutierrez GJH, Aguayo P. Apical foraminal openings in human teeth: Number and location. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1995;79:769–77.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Hassanien EE, Hashem A, Chalfin H. Histomorphometric study of the root apex of mandibular premolar teeth: An attempt to correlate working length measured with electronic and radiograph methods to various anatomic positions in the apical portion of the canal. J Endod 2008;34:408–12.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Koçak S, Koçak MM, Sağlam BC. Efficiency of 2 electronic apex locators on working length determination: A clinical study. J Conserv Dent 2013;16:229–32.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Calberson FL, Deroose CA, Hommez GM, Raes H, De Moor RJ. Shaping ability of GTTM rotary files in simulated resin root canals. Int Endod J 2002;35:607–14.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Khalilak Z, Fallahdoost A, Dadresanfar B, Rezvani G. Comparison of extracted teeth and simulated resin blocks on apical canal transportation. Iran Endod J 2008;3:109–12.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Nakatsukasa T, Ebihara A, Kimura S, Maki K, Nishijo M, Tokita D, et al. Comparative evaluation of mechanical properties and shaping the performance of heat-treated nickel titanium rotary instruments used in the single-length technique. Dent Mater J 2021;40:743–9.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Wu H, Peng C, Bai Y, Hu X, Wang L, Li C. Shaping ability of ProTaper universal, WaveOne and ProTaper next in simulated L-shaped and S-shaped root canals. BMC Oral Health 2015;15:27.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Sharifi R, Bahrampour E, Janfroozzade P, Safaei M, Mozaffari HR, Soltanimehr E, et al. Comparative evaluation of the efficacy of three methods of delivering calcium hydroxide into the root canal. Dent Med Probl 2019;56:155–9.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Czerw RJ, Fulkerson MS, Donnelly JC. An in vitro test of a simplified model to demonstrate the operation of electronic root canal measuring devices. J Endod 1994;20:605–6.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Shacham M, Levin A, Shemesh A, Lvovsky A, Ben Itzhak J, Solomonov M. Accuracy and stability of electronic apex locator length measurements in root canals with wide apical foramen: An ex vivo study. BDJ Open 2020;6:22.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Baldi JV, Victorino FR, Bernardes RA, de Moraes IG, Bramante CM, Garcia RB, et al. Influence of embedding media on the assessment of electronic apex locators. J Endod 2007;33:476–9.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Lipski M, Trąbska-Świstelnicka M, Woźniak K, Dembowska E, Droździk A. Evaluation of alginate as a substitute for root-surrounding tissues in electronic root canal measurements. Aust Endod J 2013;39:155–8.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Abdelsalam N, Hashem N. Impact of apical patency on accuracy of electronic apex locators: In vitro study. J Endod 2020;46:509–14.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Altunbas D, Kustarci A, Arslan D, Er K, Kocak S. Comparison of various current electronic apex locators to determine the working length using the clearing technique. Niger J Clin Pract 2015;18:359–63.  Back to cited text no. 26
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
27.
Martínez-Lozano MA, Forner-Navarro L, Sánchez-Cortés JL, Llena-Puy C. Methodological considerations in the determination of working length. Int Endod J 2001;34:371–6.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
Wrbas KT, Ziegler AA, Altenburger MJ, Schirrmeister JF. In vivo comparison of working length determination with two electronic apex locators. Int Endod J 2007;40:133–8.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.
Huang L. An experimental study of the principle of electronic root canal measurement. J Endod 1987;13:60–4.  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.
Tchorz J, Hellwig E, Altenburger M. Teaching model for artificial teeth and endodontic apex locators. J Dent Educ 2013;77:626–9.  Back to cited text no. 30
    
31.
Bernardo R, Alves L, Bruno A, Coutinho T, Gusman H. The accuracy of electronic apex locators for determining working length: An in vitro study with artificial teeth. Aust Endod J 2021;47:217–21.  Back to cited text no. 31
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2]



 

Top
  
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
    Abstract
   Introduction
    Materıals a...
   Results
   Discussion
    References
    Article Figures
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed346    
    Printed10    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded61    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal