|Year : 2021 | Volume
| Issue : 5 | Page : 735-746
Knowledge and behavioral assessment of dentists toward screening and managing patients with head and neck cancer in Saudi Arabia
Department of Oral Biology, Faculty of Dentistry, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
|Date of Submission||25-Jun-2020|
|Date of Acceptance||28-Aug-2020|
|Date of Web Publication||20-May-2021|
Dr. T Y Alhazzazi
Department of Oral Biology, King Abdulaziz University, Faculty of Dentistry, Jeddah
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
| Abstract|| |
Background: Widening the breadth of dentists' responsibilities to include screening all patients for life-threatening diseases, such as head and neck cancer (HNC), is crucial to improve survival rates and decrease morbidity. Aims: The study aimed to assess the knowledge and behavior of dentists toward screening and managing patients with HNC in Daudi Arabia. Thus, this study aimed to assess the knowledge and behavior of dentists toward screening and managing patients with HNC in Saudi Arabia. Methods: This cross-sectional study comprised a closed-ended electronic questionnaire sent to dentists including general practitioners, specialists, and consultants (n = 723). The e-questionnaire included questions that assessed dentists' behavior and knowledge toward screening and managing patients with HNC. The Chi-square test was used to establish relationships between categorical variables. Results: The response rate was 28.5%. Dentists obtained the dental and medical histories of 74% and 80% of their cases, respectively. Only 55% and 14% of dentists routinely ask their patients about smoking habits and family history of cancer, respectively. Additionally, only 13% and 12% always screen for HNC and were familiar with adjunct HNC screening tools, respectively. Approximately 75% of respondents identified HPV as a risk factor, whereas 54% and 41% identified human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and poor oral hygiene as risk factors, respectively. Conclusions: There is an apparent lack of essential concepts of the behavior and knowledge in our dental community with respect to screening and managing patients with HNC. More emphasis should be placed on updating information on clinical practices and having dentists familiarize themselves with HNC screening methods and tools. Ultimately, the role of the dentist should include screening and detecting systemic diseases in dental settings.
Keywords: Behavior, dentists, knowledge, head and neck cancer, oral cancer, Saudi Arabia
|How to cite this article:|
Alhazzazi T Y. Knowledge and behavioral assessment of dentists toward screening and managing patients with head and neck cancer in Saudi Arabia. Niger J Clin Pract 2021;24:735-46
|How to cite this URL:|
Alhazzazi T Y. Knowledge and behavioral assessment of dentists toward screening and managing patients with head and neck cancer in Saudi Arabia. Niger J Clin Pract [serial online] 2021 [cited 2022 Dec 3];24:735-46. Available from: https://www.njcponline.com/text.asp?2021/24/5/735/316467
| Introduction|| |
Dentists can play an important role in maintaining the general health of their patients by not only performing high-quality dental work but also by screening for life-threatening diseases such as head and neck cancer (HNC).,, Unfortunately, there remains a lack of knowledge and awareness worldwide surrounding this consideration that warrants further study.
HNC encompasses malignancies developed in the nasal cavity, sinuses, lips, salivary glands, throat, oral cavity, and larynx. HNC is one of the most common worldwide cancer types and represents a global burden. It is estimated that more than 650,000 cases and 330,000 death are reported annually. In the United States, HNC represents about 3% of all types of cancer, with an estimate of 53,000 new cases and 10,750 annual deaths. Geographically, HNC seems to have a greater impact on other areas around the world such as India, East Asia, Eastern Europe, and South America.
According to the latest cancer report in Saudi Arabia, HNC accounts for approximately 6% of all malignancies. Interestingly, because Saudi Arabia constitutes the bulk of the Arabian peninsula, with a landmass spanning more than 2 million km2, the incidence of HNC varies according to geography, with a ~30-fold difference in the age-standardized rate (ASR) between the lowest and highest prevalence rate. For instance, Jazan (Gizan) ranked highest in HNC prevalence in Saudi Arabia; more specifically, oral cancer ranked first among females and second among males. After Jazan, HNC was most prevalent in Najran. Furthermore, Allord et al. reported that 35% of oral cancer referrals in their study originated from Jazan, and Al-Ghamdi et al. reported that oral cancer was the second most common form of HNC in males from the Asir region after skin cancer and the third most common in females after thyroid and skin cancers.
All of the above regions are located in the south of Saudi Arabia and in close proximity to Yemen. In these areas, the use of smokeless tobacco (shammah) was identified as a major risk factor associated with oral cancer, which may partly explain the high prevalence of oral cancer in theses regions relative to other types of cancer.,, This illustrates that oral cancer is a significant public health problem in these regions, especially given that they are considered developing regions of Saudi Arabia.
The fact that dentists are the first in line to locate abnormalities in the head and neck region, and specifically in the oral cavity, makes them uniquely poised to help screen, diagnose, and refer such patients to the appropriate medical specialists; only then can we consider that the highest standard of care is being met. Accordingly, prevention and early detection of such cancers are two key determinants of survival and treatment outcomes. Most studies to date have focused on evaluating the knowledge, awareness, and behavior of dental students, healthcare providers, dental hygienists, and general society with regards to HNC.,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, However, few reports have assessed practicing dentists, and specifically in Saudi Arabia.,,,,,, Thus, this study aimed to assess the current knowledge and behavior of dentists toward screening and managing patients with HNC in Saudi Arabia.
| Materials and Methods|| |
The e-questionnaire protocol
This cross-sectional study comprised a closed-ended electronic questionnaire. The e-questionnaire includes questions about the participants' knowledge and behavior toward screening and managing patients with HNC.
The questionnaire was created and then reviewed by three experts in the field to ensure its validity. We piloted that initial version of the questionnaire on 25 participants to assess the questions' clarity. This version was modified following participant feedback, and the final version of the e-questionnaire was sent to dentists in major regions of Saudi Arabia, including general practitioners, specialists, and consultants (n = 723), using known and established dentistry-related social media groups in Saudi Arabia. All participants confirmed that they answered the questions to the best of their knowledge and according to their daily dental routine, and they consented to have their responses used for research and educational purposes.
The IBM SPSS software version 23 was used for statistical analysis. Simple descriptive statistics were used to define the characteristics of the study variables through counts and percentages for categorical variables. To establish a relation between categorical variables, the Chi-square test was used, where a P value <0.05 was defined as statistically significant. Two domains were used during the analysis, namely; Behavior and Knowledge, with each domain calculated by converting the answers of the (7) behavior-related questions and those of the (11) knowledge-related questions into points as follows:
For behavioral questions: “No” = 0; “Yes, sometimes” or “Only for patients with risk factors” = 1; and “Yes, always” = 2. Possible scores ranged from 0 to 14 points, which were categorized as follows:
- 0-8 = Poor Behaviors
- 9-11 = Acceptable Behaviors
- 12-14 = Excellent Behaviors
For knowledge questions: correct answer = 1; incorrect answer = 0. Possible scores ranged from 0 to 10 points, which were categorized as follows:
- 0-5 = Less Knowledgeable
- 6-7 = Slightly Knowledgeable
- 8-10 = Knowledgeable.
Human subjects statement
The e-questionnaire included written informed consent that was obtained from all participants. The e-questionnaire was approved by the ethics committee review board (Ref. No. 22-03-2020) from King Abdulaziz University Faculty of Dentistry (KAUFD) and was in full accordance with the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki.
| Results|| |
Of the 723 questionnaires that were sent, 206 were completed, indicating a response rate of 28.5%. Of those respondents, 60.7% were male and 39.3% were female. The majority of respondents were general dentists (57.8%), followed by consultants (23.8%). Approximately 46.6% of respondents were new graduates, whereas 29.6% have been practicing for >10 years. The characteristics of all 206 participants are presented in [Table 1]. Dentists' behavior toward obtaining proper dental and medical records was then assessed. Dentists that obtained full dental and medical histories for all patients including past and present illness were 74% and 80%, respectively [Figure 1]a and [Figure 1]b, [Table 2]. [Figure 1]a and [Figure 1]b, [Table 2]. Additionally, 55% of participants routinely inquire about smoking habits; however, only 14% routinely ask about family history of cancer, compared to the 53% of respondents who indicated never asking such questions [Figure 1]c and [Figure 1]d, [Table 2].
|Figure 1: Dentists' behavior toward obtaining proper dental and medical records. Percentage of dentists obtaining (a) Full dental records; (b) Full medical records; (c) Smoking history; (d) Family history of Cance|
Click here to view
Afterward, dentists were assessed for their behavior and knowledge toward HNC screening in the dental clinic. Approximately 67% of respondents reported that they routinely screen their patients for problems other than the chief complaint [Figure 2]a, [Table 2]. In addition, 50% of respondents indicated always taking panoramic radiographs, while only 13% indicated always screening for HNC as part of their daily examination protocol [Figure 2]b and [Figure 2]c, [Table 2]. When participants were asked whether they knew how to perform HNC screening, only 28% said “yes” [Figure 2]d, [Table 2], and only 12% were fully familiar with the adjunct HNC screening tools such as brush biopsy, TBlue, and VELscope [Figure 2]e. Only 65% of the participants knew that the tongue and the floor of the mouth are the most common locations of oral cancer [Figure 2]f, [Table 2].
|Figure 2: Dentists' behavior and knowledge toward HNC screening in dental clinic. Percentage of dentists (a) Screening for problems other than the chief complaint; (b) Routinely taking panoramic radiographs; (c) Always screening for HNC; (d) Knew how to perform HNC screening; (e) Knew adjunct HNC screening tools; (f) Knowing tongue and the floor of the mouth are the two most common areas of HNC|
Click here to view
Respondents were then evaluated on their knowledge of important HNC-related areas including HNC risk factors. Approximately 84% of participants responded that HNC is not always painful, and 90% accurately responded that squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) is the predominant form of HNC [Figure 3]a and [Figure 3]b, [Table 2]. With respect to risk factors, 75% of respondents knew that human papillomavirus (HPV) is a risk factor for HNC, whereas only 54% accurately identified human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) as a risk factor [Figure 3]c and [Figure 3]d, [Table 2]. Surprisingly, there were divided responses regarding whether poor oral hygiene is a risk factor for HNC: 41% of respondents answered “yes” and 41% answered “no” [Figure 3]e, [Table 2]. In addition, only 17% of respondents knew the overall 5-year survival rate of HNC [Figure 3]f, [Table 2].
|Figure 3: Dentists' knowledge on HNC-related topics. Percentage of dentists knowledge about (a) HNC representation with pain; (b) Most common type of HNC; (c) If HPV is a risk factor; (d) If HIV is a risk factor; (e) If poor oral hygiene is a risk factor; (f) The correct overall 5-year survival rate of HNC|
Click here to view
Finally, the dentists' management protocol for HNC patients was assessed. Approximately 78% of respondents believed that dentists are responsible for screening each patient for HNC and, indeed, 55% of them did detect patients with HNC or suspicious lesions requiring further attention at some point during their career [Table 2], which differed significantly between males and female dentists [69.3% vs 30.7%; *P < 0.05; [Table 3]]. However, no significant difference was found between years since graduation or profession title (data not shown). Moreover, 64% of participants preferred referring patients with suspicious lesions to oral and maxillofacial surgeons, whereas 18% preferred referring to a colleague known to deal with such cases [Figure 4]a and [Figure 4]b, [Table 2]. When participants were asked about the follow-up period for a diagnosed HNC patient, the majority agreed on a lifetime period (57%), followed by a 5-year period [14%; [Figure 4]c and [Figure 4]d, [Table 2].
|Figure 4: Dentists' management protocols for HNC patients. Percentage of dentists (a) Believing that they should screen for HNC; (b) Detecting patients with HNC or suspicious lesions; (c) Referral of HNC patients; (d) Agreement about the proper follow-up period for HNC patients|
Click here to view
Analysis of the summed behavior and knowledge scores is summarized in [Table 4]. Surprisingly, only eight of the 206 participants answered all behavior-related questions correctly, and none answered all knowledge-related questions correctly [Figure 5]a and [Figure 5]b. However, both scores were normally distributed, as shown in the histogram graph [Figure 5]a and [Figure 5]b. [Figure 6]a and [Figure 6]b show the mean score and percentage distribution of the behavior and knowledge questions to illustrate the participants' areas of strengths and weaknesses.
|Figure 6: The mean score and percentage distribution of the behavior and knowledge questions illustrating participants' areas of strengths and weaknesses. (a) Behavior questions; (b) Knowledge questions|
Click here to view
For example, scores of 1.8 and 1.73 demonstrate that the majority of the respondents routinely inquire about present and past medical and dental histories of their patients, respectively, compared to the score of 0.77 and 0.61, which reflect that dentists, unfortunately, perform less HNC screening as part of their daily examination protocol, and seldom ask for cancer family history, respectively [Figure 6]a. On the other hand, 90.3% and 84.5% of participants were knowledgeable about the common type of HNC and knew that HNC is not always painful, respectively, compared to only 27.7% and 17% who confidently knew how to perform HNC screening and knew the overall 5-year survival rate of HNC, [Figure 6]b. The survey questions and a summary of the frequency of responses are listed in [Table 2].
| Discussion|| |
Prevention and screening for oral and systemic health issues is the ultimate goal to promote a better quality of life and decrease the burden of these diseases on the healthcare system. One important parameter to achieve this goal is raising awareness and knowledge about the relationship between oral health and systemic diseases in the general population and healthcare providers alike.,,,,,,,,, Therefore, broadening dentists' responsibilities to include participating in the screening process for these diseases as part of their daily routine is imperative to overcome the sociological and economic burden imposed by these diseases and to ensure better quality and standard of care for all patients.,,
Interestingly, numerous worldwide reports have investigated the awareness, knowledge, and behavior toward HNC within the general society,,,,,, dental students,,,,,,, and hygienists.,, However, few studies have as of yet assessed these topics among practicing dentists, and fewer still among dentists practicing in Saudi Arabia. Therefore, the aim of this study was to assess the current knowledge and behavior of dentists in Saudi Arabia toward screening and managing patients with HNC.
Our results revealed a clear lack of essential knowledge and behavioral practice concepts among dentists with regards to HNC screening and management approaches. We expected to see a 100% compliance rate for obtaining full dental and medical histories. Reviewing dental and medical histories will not only prevent unexpected treatment outcomes and complications such as excessive bleeding and fainting,,, but will also facilitate reaching an accurate diagnosis, especially in cases of systemic diseases,, or referred pain., In addition, smoking and a family history of cancer have been associated with an increased risk of developing HNC. Surprisingly, only 55% and 14% ask their patients about smoking and a family history of cancer, respectively. These results are alarming and suggest that dentists could miss important precipitating factors of HNC.
Dentists were then assessed for their knowledge and behavior with respect to HNC screening in dental settings. Acknowledging and treating the patient's chief complaint is an important component of the dentist–patient relationship and helps build trust. However, it is our contention that the dentist should be responsible for screening patients for other oral or systemic health problems during dental visits to prevent potential disease progression and direct them to the appropriate dental or medical specialist. By doing so, dentists will ensure better oral and general health for all patients., This should be a routine practice goal for all dental specialties and general practitioners. The poor average percentage (67%) of dentists who reported routinely screening their patients for issues other than the chief complaint indicated that some difficulty may be faced in achieving this goal.
Screening and early detection of HNC have been established as two important key players in determining the survival rate of HNC patients.,, Moreover, obtaining digital radiographs (e.g., panoramic radiographs), screening all patients for HNC, and being familiar with adjunct HNC screening tools are all important factors that will help in the screening and early detection of HNC patients.,,, In a systematic review by Uribe et al., panoramic radiographs were found to be a cost-effective and reliable method for detecting bone defects of patients with oral SCC, with a specificity of 91.7%, compared to more invasive and expensive methods such as computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans (100% specificity).
Our data reveal a clear deficiency in these areas, as only half of the respondents indicated performing routine panoramic radiographs, and only 13% reported screening all patients for HNC. Moreover, only a few were knowledgeable on how to perform HNC screening and were familiar with some of the HNC adjunct screenings tools (e.g., brush biopsy, TBlue, VELscope). Familiarizing with such tools has been shown to be an effective method for the early detection of HNC patients in dental clinics.,
SCC accounts for more than 90% of all head and neck malignancies, and oral cancer represents the majority of HNC cases, wherein the tongue, followed by the floor of the mouth, are the most common sites of oral cancer., The 5-year survival rate of HNC depends on several factors including early detection, location, and stage; nevertheless, the overall 5-year survival rate of HNC averages 50% and has only marginally improved over the past decade. This type of cancer is not always painful during its early stages,, which may contribute to the delay in diagnosis and thereby affecting the survival rate.
Participants' knowledge towards important HNC-related information, including HNC risk factors, was then queried. The majority of our participants reported that they knew that SCC is the predominant form of HNC and that pain is not always present in early HNC. However, only 65% of respondents were knowledgeable about the common sites of oral cancer, compared to 17% who thought that the tongue and lips are the most commonly affected sites. Regarding risk factors, studies have shown that smoking, alcohol, and HPV are among the most common factors that can cause HNC., In addition, other emerging HNC risk factors have emerged, such as HIV and poor oral hygiene.,,,,, Our data show that an appreciable proportion (75%) of respondents knew that HPV is a risk factor for HNC, relative to the mere 54% who thought that HIV is a risk factor. However, only 41% of participants believed that poor oral hygiene is a risk factor for oral cancer, compared to 18% who did not know the correct answer and 41% who answered “no.” These factors have recently evolved and our data demonstrate that the participants' knowledge in these areas is not up to date.
Surprisingly, only 17% were knowledgeable about the correct answer to the overall 5-year survival rate of HNC, whereas 50% answered that they “do not know.” This indicated a clear lack of knowledge on such important information and further emphasizes the importance of keeping up to date on emerging information. Thus, educating patients about risk factors and survival rates are two important parameters when it comes to patient motivation and prevention.
Next, dentists' management protocol for HNC patients was evaluated. Interestingly, although the majority of the participants believed that dentists are responsible for screening each patient for HNC, this was not reflected in their self-reported behavior. As our results demonstrate, only 13% of respondents always screen for HNC as part of their daily examination protocol.
Regarding the follow-up period, more than half of respondents believed that these patients should be followed up for life, followed by 14% who believed that 5 years is a satisfactory follow-up period. Nonetheless, there remain no common and clear recommendations or guidelines for an appropriate follow up-period for HNC patients, which can vary depending on multidisciplinary team decisions made on a case-by-case basis. A study by Joshi et al. reported that 56% of participating clinicians would follow-up their patients for a minimum of 5 years, while 22% would do so for life. The latter statistic came mostly from maxillofacial surgeons. Therefore, while a lifetime follow-up period, which was suggested by the majority of our respondents, seems daunting, it should nevertheless be attempted. Follow-up visits would entail screening for treatment complications, recurrence, metastasis, and patient support.
In general, our data seem to agree with those of other international studies in which deficits in the knowledge and clinical practices of dental practitioners were noted and educational reinforcement was needed in regards to HNC screening and management.,,,,, Finally, our analysis of the summed behavior and knowledge scores revealed areas of strengths and weaknesses among our participants.
It is worth highlighting that there is a clear gap between what the dentists in our study believe and what they actually do in their daily practice. In addition, the loss of confidence in how to perform a proper HNC screening in the clinic on a daily basis may underlie its lack of application in our cohort. Moreover, the general lack of knowledge that poor oral hygiene can be an important emerging risk factor for HNC is an alarming sign that dental practitioners should invest more time in updating their general knowledge about critical information that will improve and enrich the standards of care they provide. This can be easily done by attending conferences or even webinars from home.
One of our study limitations may be the low response rate. The study was conducted during the Covid-19 pandemic; thus, we expected respondents to be at home more than usual. Considering that three reminders were sent to the participants to answer the questionnaire, a higher response rate was expected. In addition, we would have wanted to include more questions that specifically targeted risk factors and related topics, but it is well known that lengthy questionnaires are poorly received and yield a lower response rate than brief questionnaires.
| Conclusions|| |
There is a clear lack of essential concepts of behavior and knowledge aspects in the Saudi Arabian dental community in regard to screening and managing patients with HNC. The gap between the perceived knowledge and the actual practice in daily basis is alarming. More emphasis should be placed on updating information on clinical practices and having dentists familiarize themselves with HNC screening methods and tools. No significant difference was found between the year since graduation and employment position in our study, which highlights the importance of dentists in the early screening and detection of systemic diseases in dental settings. Only then can dentists provide patients with the highest quality of care and decrease the burden of non-communicable diseases and risk factors, such as hypertension, diabetes, and HNC.
Financial support and sponsorship
This project was funded by the Deanship of Scientific Research (DSR) King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, under grant no. G-720-165-38. The author, therefore, acknowledge with thanks DSR for their technical and financial support.
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
| References|| |
Lamster IB, Myers-Wright N. Oral health care in the future: Expansion of the scope of dental practice to improve health. J Dent Educ 2017;81:eS83-90.
Ligier K, Dejardin O, Launay L, Benoit E, Babin E, Bara S, et al.
Health professionals and the early detection of head and neck cancers: A population-based study in a high incidence area. BMC Cancer 2016;16:456.
Wong T, Wiesenfeld D. Oral cancer. Aust Dent J 2018;63 Suppl 1:S91-9.
Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Ervik M, Rajesh D, Eser S, Mathers C, et al.
GLOBOCAN 2012 v1.0, Cancer Incidence and Mortality Worldwide: IARC CancerBase No. 11 [Internet]. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2013.
Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global Cancer Statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. Cancer J Clin 2018;68:394-424.
Siegel R, Miller K, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2020. CA Cancer J Clin 2020;70:7-30.
Sankaranarayanan R, Ramadas K, Amarasinghe H, Subramanian S, Johnson N. Oral cancer: Prevention, early detection, and treatment. In: Gelband H, Jha P, Sankaranarayanan R, Horton S, editors. Cancer: Disease Control Priorities. Vol. 3. 3rd
ed.. Washington, (DC): The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank; 2015.
Brown A, Ravichandran K, Warnakulasuriya S. The unequal burden related to the risk of oral cancer in the different regions of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Community Dent Health 2006;23:101-6.
Allard WF, DeVol EB, Te OB. Smokeless tobacco (shamma) and oral cancer in Saudi Arabia. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1999;27:398-405.
Al-Ghamdi SA, Malatani T, Kameswaran M, Khurana P. Head and neck cancer in a referral center in Asir region. Ann Saudi Med 1994;14:383-6.
Quadri MF, Alharbi F, Bajonaid AM, Moafa IH, Sharwani AA, Alamir AH. Oral squamous cell carcinoma and associated risk factors in Jazan, Saudi Arabia: A hospital based case control study. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2015;16:4335-8.
Alsanosy RM. Smokeless tobacco (shammah) in Saudi Arabia: A review of its pattern of use, prevalence, and potential role in oral cancer. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2014;15:6477-83.
Bukhary S, Alreheli R, Albahiti MH, Al-Dabbagh RA, Al-Hazmi N, Alhazzazi T. Awareness and knowledge of head and neck cancer risks: Do Saudi adults know enough? J Int Oral Health 2020;12:226-30. [Full text]
Alhazzazi TY. Evaluation of head and neck cancer awareness and screening status in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2016;17:1135-9.
Nicotera G, Di Stasio SM, Angelillo IF. Knowledge and behaviors of primary care physicians on oral cancer in Italy. Oral Oncol 2004;40:490-5.
Webster JD, Batstone M, Farah CS. Missed opportunities for oral cancer screening in Australia. J Oral Pathol Med 2019;48:595-603.
Ghani WM, Doss JG, Jamaluddin M, Kamaruzaman D, Zain RB. Oral cancer awareness and its determinants among a selected Malaysian population. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2013;14:1957-63.
Al-Maweri SA, Tarakji B, Alsalhani AB, Al-Shamiri HM, Alaizari NA, Altamimi MA, et al.
Oral cancer awareness of the general public in Saudi Arabia. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2015;16:3377-81.
Patton LL, Agans R, Elter JR, Southerland JH, Strauss RP, Kalsbeek WD. Oral cancer knowledge and examination experiences among North Carolina adults. J Public Health Dent 2004;64:173-80.
Jaber L, Shaban S, Hariri D. Oral cancer prevention and early detection: Knowledge and practice among Saudi Arabian healthcare practitioners. Int J Health Care Qual Assur 2012;25:64-74.
Al-Dakkak I. Public awareness of oral cancer and associated risk factors is low. Evid Based Dent 2010;11:106-7.
Lopez-Jornet P, Camacho-Alonso F, Molina Minano F. Knowledge and attitude towards risk factors in oral cancer held by dental hygienists in the Autonomous Community of Murcia (Spain): A pilot study. Oral Oncol 2007;43:602-6.
Forrest JL, Horowitz AM, Shmuely Y. Dental hygienists' knowledge, opinions, and practices related to oral and pharyngeal cancer risk assessment. J Dent Hyg 2001;75:271-81.
Bamhisoun MM, Alqahtani RS, Bogari DF, Al-Hazmi N, Bukhary S, Jan AM, et al.
Assessment of head and neck cancer knowledge and awareness levels among undergraduate dental students at King Abdulaziz University Faculty of Dentistry. J Dent Health Oral Disord Ther 2017;8:294.
Kujan O, Alzoghaibi I, Azzeghaiby S, Altamimi MA, Tarakji B, Hanouneh S, et al.
Knowledge and attitudes of Saudi dental undergraduates on oral cancer. J Cancer Educ 2014;29:735-8.
Hassona Y, Scully C, Abu Tarboush N, Baqain Z, Ismail F, Hawamdeh S, et al.
Oral cancer knowledge and diagnostic ability among dental students. J Cancer Educ 2017;32:566-70.
Jafer M, Crutzen R, Moafa I, van den Borne B. What do dentists and dental students think of oral cancer and its control and prevention strategies? A qualitative study in Jazan dental school. J Cancer Educ 2019. doi: 10.1007/s13187-019-01609-z.
Keser G, Pekiner FN. Assessing oral cancer awareness among dental students. J Cancer Educ 2019;34:512-8.
Boroumand S, Garcia AI, Selwitz RH, Goodman HS. Knowledge and opinions regarding oral cancer among Maryland dental students. J Cancer Educ 2008;23:85-91.
Carter LM, Ogden GR. Oral cancer awareness of undergraduate medical and dental students. BMC Med Educ 2007;7:44.
Al-Maweri S, Abbas A, Tarakji B, Al-Jamaei A, Alaizari N, Al-Shamiri H. Knowledge and opinions regarding oral cancer among Yemeni dental students. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2015;16:1765-70.
Alqaryan S, Aldrees T, Almatrafi S, Alharbi A, Alhumaid H. Awareness of head and neck cancers in Saudi Arabia. A questionnaire based study. Saudi Med J 2020;41:400-5.
Jafer M, Crutzen R, Jafer A, van den Borne B. What do dental college clinicians know about oral cancer and its risk factors? An assessment among final year students, interns and faculty members in saudi arabia. J Clin Exp Dent 2018;10:e908-e13.
Hashim R, Abo-Fanas A, Al-Tak A, Al-Kadri A, Abu Ebaid Y. Early detection of oral cancer- Dentists' knowledge and practices in the United Arab Emirates. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2018;19:2351-5.
Leonel A, Soares C, Lisboa de Castro JF, Bonan PRF, Ramos-Perez FMM, Perez D. Knowledge and attitudes of primary health care dentists regarding oral cancer in Brazil. Acta Stomatol Croat 2019;53:55-63.
Alonge OK, Narendran S. Oral cancer knowledge and practices of dentists along the Texas-Mexico border. J Cancer Educ 2004;19:6-11.
Decuseara G, MacCarthy D, Menezes G. Oral cancer: Knowledge, practices and opinions of dentists in Ireland. J Ir Dent Assoc 2011;57:209-14.
Horowitz AM, Drury TF, Goodman HS, Yellowitz JA. Oral pharyngeal cancer prevention and early detection. Dentists' opinions and practices. J Am Dent Assoc 2000;131:453-62.
Dubar M, Delatre V, Moutier C, Sy K, Agossa K. Awareness and practices of general practitioners towards the oral-systemic disease relationship: A regionwide survey in France. J Eval Clin Pract 2019. doi: 10.1111/jep.13343.
Gaddey HL. Oral manifestations of systemic disease. Gen Dent 2017;65:23-9.
Hung M, Moffat R, Gill G, Lauren E, Ruiz-Negron B, Rosales MN, et al.
Oral health as a gateway to overall health and well-being: Surveillance of the geriatric population in the United States. Spec Care Dentist 2019;39:354-61.
Joseph BK, Kullman L, Sharma PN. The oral-systemic disease connection: A retrospective study. Clin Oral Investig 2016;20:2267-73.
Greenberg BL, Glick M. Assessing systemic disease risk in a dental setting: A public health perspective. Dent Clin North Am 2012;56:863-74.
Hendricson WD, Cohen PA. Oral health care in the 21st
century: Implications for dental and medical education. Acad Med 2001;76:1181-206.
Almehmadi AH, Alzaid G, Quqandi S, Almalki G, Bannan A, AlHindi A, et al.
Awareness of the effect of diabetes on oral health among a population in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. Oral Health Prev Dent 2020;18:27-33.
Bogari DF. Dentists' knowledge and behavior toward managing hypertensive patients. Niger J Clin Pract 2019;22:154-61.
] [Full text]
Sproat C, Beheshti S, Harwood AN, Crossbie D. Should we screen for hypertension in general dental practice? Br Dent J 2009;207:275-7.
Prasad KD, Hegde C, Alva H, Shetty M. Medical and dental emergencies and complications in dental practice and its management. J Educ Ethics Dent 2012;2:13-9. [Full text]
Pereira Tdos S, Pelinsari FC, Ruas BM, Avelar LP, da Fonseca VJ, de Abreu MH, et al.
Postoperative complications after dental extraction in liver pretransplant patients. Spec Care Dentist 2016;36:277-81.
Nagendrababu V, Segura-Egea JJ, Fouad AF, Pulikkotil SJ, Dummer PMH. Association between diabetes and the outcome of root canal treatment in adults: An umbrella review. Int Endod J 2020;53:455-66.
Loushine RJ, Weller RN, Kimbrough WF, Liewehr FR. Secondary hyperparathyroidism: A case report. J Endod 2003;29:272-4.
Basati MS. Sickle cell disease and pulpal necrosis: A review of the literature for the primary care dentist. Prim Dent J 2014;3:76-9.
Lee JJ, Cheng SJ, Lin SK, Chiang CP, Yu CH, Kok SH. Gingival squamous cell carcinoma mimicking a dentoalveolar abscess: Report of a case. J Endod 2007;33:177-80.
Reeh ES, elDeeb ME. Referred pain of muscular origin resembling endodontic involvement. Case report. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1991;71:223-7.
Natkin E, Harrington GW, Mandel MA. Anginal pain referred to the teeth. Report of a case. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1975;40:678-80.
Negri E, Boffetta P, Berthiller J, Castellsague X, Curado MP, Dal Maso L, et al.
Family history of cancer: Pooled analysis in the International Head and Neck Cancer Epidemiology Consortium. Int J Cancer 2009;124:394-401.
Puturidze S, Margvelashvili M, Bilder L, Kalandadze M, Margvelashvili V. Relationship between general health, oral health and healthy lifestyle in elderly population (Review). Goergian Med News 2018:17-21.
Bsoul SA, Huber MA, Terezhalmy GT. Squamous cell carcinoma of the oral tissues: A comprehensive review for oral healthcare providers. J Contemp Dent Pract 2005;6:1-16.
Yeole BB, Sankaranarayanan R, Sunny MSL, Swaminathan R, Parkin DM. Survival from head and neck cancer in Mumbai (Bombay), India. Cancer 2000;89:437-44.
Munhoz EA, Cardoso CL, Capelozza AL, Oliveira PR, Damante JH. Panoramic radiography and its role in the diagnosis of systemic disorders. Gen Dent 2010;58:46-9.
Rhoades J, Scott R. Panoramic radiographs for the study of the head and neck. Dent Assist 1970;39:16-22.
Huber MA. Adjunctive diagnostic aids in oral cancer screening: An update. Tex Dent J 2012;129:471-80.
Patton LL, Epstein JB, Kerr AR. Adjunctive techniques for oral cancer examination and lesion diagnosis: A systematic review of the literature. J Am Dent Assoc 2008;139:896-905; quiz 93-4.
Uribe S, Rojas LA, Rosas CF. Accuracy of imaging methods for detection of bone tissue invasion in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2013;42:20120346.
Alsarraf HA, Kujan O, Farah CS. The utility of oral brush cytology in the early detection of oral cancer and oral potentially malignant disorders: A systematic review. J Oral Pathol Med 2018;47:104-16.
Jitender S, Sarika G, Varada HR, Omprakash Y, Mohsin K. Screening for oral cancer. J Exp Ther Oncol 2016;11:303-7.
Cramer JD, Johnson JT, Nilsen ML. Pain in head and neck cancer survivors: Prevalence, predictors, and quality-of-life impact. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2018;159:853-8.
Kobayashi K, Hisamatsu K, Suzui N, Hara A, Tomita H, Miyazaki T. A review of HPV-related head and neck cancer. J Clin Med 2018;7:241.
Yenugadhati N, Albalawi AN, Qureshey AT, Qureshey ET, Al-Jahdali H, Jazieh AR, et al.
Associated factors for oral health problems in a sample of Saudi cancer patients. Cancer Manag Res 2018;10:1285-93.
Gupta B, Bray F, Kumar N, Johnson NW. Associations between oral hygiene habits, diet, tobacco and alcohol and risk of oral cancer: A case-control study from India. Cancer Epidemiol 2017;51:7-14.
Auclin E, Quero L. [Head and neck cancers in HIV patients]. Bull Cancer 2014;101:1030-3.
Ceccarelli M, Rullo EV, Facciola A, Madeddu G, Cacopardo B, Taibi R, et al.
Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma and its correlation with human papillomavirus in people living with HIV: A systematic review. Oncotarget 2018;9:17171-80.
Singh B, Sabin S, Rofim O, Shaha A, Har-El G, Lucente FE. Alterations in head and neck cancer occurring in HIV-infected patients--results of a pilot, longitudinal, prospective study. Acta Oncol 1999;38:1047-50.
Engsig FN, Gerstoft J, Kronborg G, Larsen CS, Pedersen G, Pedersen C, et al.
Head and neck cancer in HIV patients and their parents: A Danish cohort study. Clin Epidemiol 2011;3:217-27.
Cohen EE, LaMonte SJ, Erb NL, Beckman KL, Sadeghi N, Hutcheson KA, et al.
American Cancer Society head and neck cancer survivorship care guideline. CA Cancer J Clin 2016;66:203-39.
Joshi A, Calman F, O'Connell M, Jeannon JP, Pracy P, Simo R. Current trends in the follow-up of head and neck cancer patients in the UK. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2010;22:114-8.
[Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4], [Figure 5], [Figure 6]
[Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4]