Medical and Dental Consultantsí Association of Nigeria
Home - About us - Editorial board - Search - Ahead of print - Current issue - Archives - Submit article - Instructions - Subscribe - Advertise - Contacts - Login 
  Users Online: 4092   Home Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size
Year : 2018  |  Volume : 21  |  Issue : 7  |  Page : 912-920

Comparison of time-dependent two-dimensional and three-dimensional stability with micro-computerized tomography and wettability of three impression materials

1 Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Inonu University, Malatya, Turkey
2 Clinician, Prosthodontist, Malatya, Turkey
3 Clinician, Orthodontist, Malatya, Turkey

Correspondence Address:
Dr. G Karaaslan
Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Inonu University, 44280, Malatya
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

DOI: 10.4103/njcp.njcp_314_17

Rights and Permissions

Objectives: The objective of this study is to explore time-dependent dimensional stability of three different elastomeric impression materials – vinyl polyether silicone (VPES), vinyl polysiloxane (VPS), and polyether (PE) – through micro-computerized tomography (μ-CT) imaging, allows three-dimensional (3D) imaging and measurement without sample preparation or chemical fixation. Materials and Methods: Thirty specimens were created using 3 mm high, 30 mm wide Teflon molds (n = 10). Specimens were scanned with μ-CT on the 1st (T1) h and 1st (T2), 7th (T3), and 14th (T4) days. 3D models were created at the above-mentioned times, volumetric measurements were conducted and dimensional changes were calculated. Diameters and heights of each impression material were measured with 2D analyses. Furthermore, contact angle measurements of these elastomeric impression materials were collected using the sessile drop method during and after polymerization at 0, 2, 5, 20, 60, 120, and 240 s These measurements were made on specimens (n = 10) prepared in standard sizes using a 50 μm deep stainless steel die with dimensions of 62 mm × 20 mm × 3 mm. Results: Evaluation of the dimensional volume changes of the VPES, VPS, and PE measurements showed there to be no statistically significant differences between the T1, T2, T3, and T4 (P > 0.05). Only the decreases in the volume averages of T3 and T4 in the VPES were statistically significant (P < 0.05). As a result of binary comparisons, the evaluation of contact angle measurements of VPES, VPS, and PE materials during and after polymerization were compared. The average contact angle measurements of the VPS group were statistically significantly lower than the averages of the VPES and PE groups (P < 0.01). Conclusions: VPS was found to be the most stable impression material concerning dimensional change and wettability.

Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)

 Article Access Statistics
    PDF Downloaded252    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal