Medical and Dental Consultantsí Association of Nigeria
Home - About us - Editorial board - Search - Ahead of print - Current issue - Archives - Submit article - Instructions - Subscribe - Advertise - Contacts - Login 
  Users Online: 660   Home Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size
Year : 2018  |  Volume : 21  |  Issue : 11  |  Page : 1461-1467

Comparison of sleep quality and quality of life indexes with sociodemographic characteristics in patients with chronic kidney disease

1 Nephrology Division, Department of Internal Medicine, Ordu University, School of Medicine, Ordu, Turkey
2 Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Ordu University, School of Medicine, Ordu, Turkey
3 Clinic of Nephrology, Ordu State Hospital, Ordu, Turkey

Correspondence Address:
Dr. A Karatas
Ordu University, School of Medicine, Training and Research Hospital, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Bucak Town, Nefs-i Bucak Street, Ordu
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

DOI: 10.4103/njcp.njcp_146_18

Rights and Permissions

Aims: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a serious health problem due to high mortality and morbidity, negative impact on the patients' quality of life (QOL), high diagnostic and therapeutic cost, and the burden on society. Sleep, which is one of the main needs of the human body, is important regarding the health and QOL in all ages. The objective of our study was to plan the quality of sleep and life quality in adults with CKD. Materials and Methods: Total 240 cases (91 healthy volunteers, 75 predialysis patients, and 74 hemodialysis (HD) patients) were included in our study. Our study was designed as a prospective survey with a face-to-face interview method. The sleep quality was evaluated with Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). The WHO Quality of Life-short version (BREF) survey questions were used for QOL, and scoring was performed. Results: The analysis showed that the results of PSQI scores, QOL scores, and evaluation of the age variable were statistically significant (P = 0.001, P < 0.001, P < 0.001, respectively). Likewise, the PSQI scores were low in healthy volunteers but were the highest in predialysis patients. The scores of the HD patients were between the scores of predialysis and healthy volunteers. The score of the QOL increased with educational level. There was a positive correlation between Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) level and QOL (P < 0.001; r = 0.260) and a negative correlation between MDRD level and PSQI score (P < 0.001, r = −0.202). Conclusion: Like in HD patients, close follow-up of predialysis patients with CKD is critical considering the resolution of the encountered problems. We believe that the increase in QOL and sleep in patients with CKD may decrease the morbidity.

Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)

 Article Access Statistics
    PDF Downloaded395    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal