Medical and Dental Consultantsí Association of Nigeria
Home - About us - Editorial board - Search - Ahead of print - Current issue - Archives - Submit article - Instructions - Subscribe - Advertise - Contacts - Login 
  Users Online: 669   Home Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size
 
 
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Ahead of Print

Prevention of alveolar osteitis after third molar surgery: Comparative study of the effect of warm saline and chlorhexidine mouth rinses


 Department of Dental Surgery, University of Calabar Teaching Hospital, University of Calabar, Calabar, Nigeria

Correspondence Address:
OD Osunde,
Department of Dental Surgery, University of Calabar Teaching Hospital, University of Calabar, Calabar
Nigeria
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

Background: Chlorhexidine mouth rinses have a proven efficacy for the prevention of alveolar osteitis after third molar surgery. This study compares the efficacy of warm saline rinse, a component of postextraction instructions, with that of chlorhexidine in our institution over a period of 2 years. Patients and Methods: Apparently healthy patients who were referred to the Oral Surgery Clinic of our institution, with an indication for surgical extraction of lower third molar were prospectively, consecutively, and uniformly randomized into warm saline and chlorhexidine groups. The experimental group (n = 50/100) were instructed to gargle twice daily with warm saline, whereas the chlorhexidine group (n = 50/100) were instructed to gargle with 0.12% chlorhexidine. Information on demographic, types and level of impaction, indications for extraction, and development of alveolar osteitis were obtained and analyzed. Comparative statistics were done using Pearson's Chi-square, Fisher's exact, or Mann-Whitney U-tests as appropriate. P <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: The demographic, types and level of impaction as well as indications for extractions were comparable between the study groups (P > 0.05). The overall prevalence of alveolar osteitis was 5%. There was no statistically significant difference between application of warm saline and 0.12% chlorhexidine rinse with respect to the development of alveolar osteitis (P = 0.648). Conclusion: Warm saline mouth rinse is equally as effective as chlorhexidine mouth rinse, as prophylaxis against prevention of alveolar osteitis after third molar surgery.


Print this article
Search
 Back
 
  Search Pubmed for
 
    -  Osunde O D
    -  Anyanechi C E
    -  Bassey G O
 Citation Manager
 Article Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed533    
    PDF Downloaded32    

Recommend this journal